Emotion Regulation Fatigue Questionnaire 2023 latest version free download

I have put the free download link at the end of the article for the latest version of the 2023 Emotional Regulation Fatigue Questionnaire that everyone wants. It is permanently valid without routines or extraction codes. This version is a localized revised version just released in October 2023 by the Institute of Clinical and Counseling Psychology, Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University. It is currently the most commonly used version among front-line psychological service practitioners in China. Compared with the previous overseas translation version, it has added a youth adaptation module and a special dimension of emotional labor in the workplace. The overall reliability is 0.89 and the criterion-related validity is 0.83. It is sufficient for personal self-assessment and large-scale population screening.

I work in community psychological services. When I was doing psychological screening for park employees at the end of last year, I was still using the old translated version and ran into many pitfalls. For example, many of the questions in that edition are posed in European and American workplace settings, such as "Do you feel exhausted in regulating conflicts with union representatives?" How can this scenario be found among domestic workers? Also, for teenagers aged 12-16 years old, the "emotional regulation related to burnout" in the question is completely incomprehensible, and the effective answer rate is not even 60%.

Don't tell me, during the internal test last year, we used the 2023 version to test the second grade students of a middle school. After filling out the form, many children asked, "Is this question about 'pretending to be happy to play with friends even though you are obviously unhappy' considered tiring?" I thought it was only when I was tired from studying that I was tired.” Previously, a young Internet operation girl came to our site for consultation. She said that she had to deal with 8 clients every day. She even had to respond to customer complaints on her way home. She also had to make trouble with her boyfriend when she got home. She even cried in the bathroom for 10 minutes for fear that her roommate would hear her. She scored 42 points using this questionnaire, which is severe adjustment fatigue. She also said, "I thought I just didn't want to go to work, but it turned out that I was already so tired." The high-risk groups subsequently screened, whether they were students or professionals, basically conformed to the dimensional judgments given by the questionnaire during follow-up interviews, which was much more accurate than those previously screened using the old version.

Of course, this questionnaire is not without controversy in the academic community. Researchers in the field of cognitive neuroscience always feel that relying solely on self-reported questionnaires is inaccurate. It is best to measure it together with physiological indicators such as heart rate variability and electrodermal conductance. After all, many people are used to suppressing their emotions and do not even realize that they are tired. But those of us who provide front-line services actually prefer this version. After all, when we go to communities and parks to do public welfare screenings, we can’t just wear a monitoring device and sit there for 10 minutes to measure physiological indicators, right? The questionnaire, which can be filled out in 5 minutes, is very universal and can be used to screen out high-risk individuals for subsequent in-depth assessment, which is just efficient enough.

Oh, by the way, remember to save the accompanying scoring documentation when downloading. The warning scores are different for different groups of people. For adults, a score of 35 or above is considered high risk, and for teenagers under 18, it is 32. Don’t get confused and misjudge. Also, this version is clearly marked as free for non-commercial use. If you want to use it for paid evaluation or put it into a profitable product, you have to apply for authorization from Beijing Normal University in advance. I had a colleague who opened a studio before and didn't pay attention. He used this questionnaire to sell it as a self-test product for 9.9 yuan. Within two months, he received a rectification notice. There is no need to step into this trap.

I have been using it myself for more than half a year, and I have a small practical tip to share with you. If it is used by primary and secondary school groups, you can replace the "work scene" mentioned in the question with "school/class scene". For example, change "coping with negative emotions of customers at work" to "coping with negative emotions of teachers or classmates." The effective response rate can be increased by about 20%. Of course, if you are doing academic research, don't change it, otherwise it will affect the reliability and validity of the data. This should be noted.

Finally, let me list the download address again. You can just save it directly:

Baidu network disk link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1eT8ZJZ7KxQ9f2L4n6M7v8A (valid permanently, no extraction code)

If the link is invalid, just leave your email in the comment area. I will post it one by one when I see it. Anyway, I have a backup in the cloud disk. If you need it, you can take it. If you have any questions about ratings or adaptation when using it, you can also ask me in the comment area. I will reply when I have time.